Thursday, March 31, 2005

Why I continue to be believe in God


The neighbourhood I grew up in never required me to think about atheism. Indeed I never knew about existence of such dis-belief untill I came to college. I always thought that everybody believes in the God irrespective of the means they chose to achieve Him. But as I matured as scintific rational individual my opinion and definition of theism were modified. I not only happened to come across numerous atheists but I also participated in unending debates over this with them. I found that most of atheists are well-educated well-to-do intellectuals who have plenty of scietific and rational reasons to be an atheist. This post is not an attempt to pursuade - which would be futile even if it were to - or diatribe against atheists but explantion of why I continue to be theist even after being an logical thinker.

Many atheists believe that theism is same as being religious. This is downright incorrect as belief in the God does not require you being the religious. This simply rules out any rituals, superstitions or traditions of any religion that you might disagree with. I will spare religions like Islam where following prescribed practices is mandatory to belief in the God.

If you noticed, then you would have realised that I did not use phrase "belief in existence of God" since definition of existence is simply controversial in this context. One critical point that many atheists miss is that they argue about "existence" of God based on postulates of modern science and logic. Being myself an engineer I am not averse to these propositions but it must be understood that there may exist other branches of philosophy - as the science is one of them - where these laws do not hold and without any knowledge of them we cannot define existence of such entities in scientific manner. God may "exist" without being proven to exist with modern science. On an hypothetical note, what if we are all part of grand experimental setup by some God? Will we ever know? May be not, since "knowing" based on observation, interpretation, knowledge, reasoning may not be what you percieve it to be. In one of the science fiction book, Issac Asimov postulates that universe is as much test setup for some other entity(ies) as bacterial cultures are for us. Do we know that bacteria themselves might be forming scientific theories about their existence and changes in their environment (planned by human scientists)? This is may sound too far fetched but is there a way to disprove it? We may never know. And I for one, don't even care.

One of the famous argument against omnipotent God is weather He (or She) can create a stone so heavy that He cannot lift. I would say, why not? You may consider me irrational or point out inconsitency in the act as implied by the statement. But hey, who says that God has to be cosistent as your science defines it?

Given that our definition of modern science are inadequate and perhaps inapplicable to Him, how do we go about dealing with this issue? You cannot prove or disprove Him. Thus you end up being agnostic. But then as someone wisely said, an agnostic is simply an atheist who doesn't has courage to accept so. I tend to agree.

Given this, there are aplenty of reasons in believing in Him.

Believing in God makes you explicitly aware of your acts which would please Him and which would not. You subconscioucly try to follow these and live a good life. You can be good of course, and have your own set of rights or wrongs, but then you are knowingly leaving a margin for wrong since, first - rights-wrongs are relative and subjective terms when you define them yourself, and second - you don't belive that you are answerable to anybody which means that you may change positions. Of course, many people commit most heinous of acts in name of God, but that is wrong interpretation by them and is out of scope of this discussion.

Believing in God gives your life hope, aspirations and faith which are necessary for a person throughout his life. It also gives you little margin for making errors since you are not exactly and sole maker of your life. You may consider this as 'blaming failures on destiny' but done with reasonable faith and not always, I percieve this to be okay as it lets you live happily instead of in constant worry. As a well-to-do professional you may not believe in destiny but for millions of poor people in India who sleep empty stomach everyday with only one faith, it is only thing they can relate to.

Believing in God also gives you company in despair and adversities. It also makes you humble in your successes since you are not lone doer of everything. While atheist has to express ignorance on occurance of scientifically-yet-unexplained events and observations, a theist has opportunity to depend on the divine explanation. It has a very subtle influence on mental feelings of human which faith supports.

Why then we sell ourselves to dry reasoning, specially if denying that would do more good or atleast no harm than accepting it, and deprieve ourselves from spiritual bliss that one encounters in faith. Remember that your don't have to be religious or perform any rituals to be theist. After all, not believing in God is itself a belief of one kind. Just for this, I prefer to be scientifically irrational for my own good, and for the good of the mankind. Which I think, is more rational than rationally adamant stand of being worldly irrational of an atheist.

I refuse to prove that I exist since demand of proof implies lack of belief and without belief I am nothing.
- God

For me as theist, reasoning starts with existence of God. How can I then question the postulate that is the beginning and end of all other postulates? On what independent frame I stand and in what words I chose to question the very entity that is reason of existence of those instruments in first place?

Browse these interesting links too ...
God, Arguments for God, Arguments against God

Update (April 14):

What is atheist's equivalent to praying to God? You may argue, there needn't be any. But consider this. You are about to take most important examination of your life - or so you think - and you work extremely hard. A theist would, parallelly pray to Almighty for success. This does not mean that theist will rely on God to clear his exam for him. He understands that God helps those who help themselves. He will work as hard as he can. But then, there is alway uncertainity, and genuine apprehension about "what if" factors. A theist would usually overcome those by praying to God. I am not able to figure out what would atheist do? He will work as hard as he can, of course, but is there nothing else? Okay, consider that exam has been taken, and one is loosing sleeps over results. There is nothing you can do now. A believer would still pray to God. What would non-believer do? I can't think of anything, but guess that he would fridget, get itchy, worry etc. How does a atheist counter eternal "what if" fear? For this reason itself, to keep your sanity under stress, I think belief in God helps. After all, even if you are 100% confident about results, there is still legitimate uncertainity untill you are confirmed.

Update (16 September, 2009)
http://www.jesusandmo.net/2009/09/15/logos/

Sunday, March 20, 2005

Mother commits suicide for kids!


Mother commits suicide to donate her eyes to her blind children!

An utmost and heart wrenching example of sacrifice, only a mother can do on this earth. How many of us can ever understand this avtaar of a woman? Or still, can we ever?

Imagine the agony of inability to get eye donors before one thinks of taking such extreme step! And how many of us have registered our/relative's organs for donation, or donated in the past?

Saturday, March 19, 2005

Visa denial to Modi: Outrageous!


For those secular out there in India who think that denial of Visa to Narendra Modi by US Govt is an apt punishment, here is exact definition of "secularism" by current Indian standards, which unfortunately is not implied by our Constitution, but perhaps suits you:

"For 'secular' India, secularism is not divorced between the State and the religion. For them secularism is exclusively for the benefit of the minorities. Extend it, secularism means pampering the minorities. Go further, it includes being allergic to the majority. That, unless one explicitly appeases the minorities and is overtly allergic to Hindus, one is not 'secular' enough. In Indian politics, uniting a minority for votes is 'secular.' Consequently, uniting the majority is anti-'secular.' And organising the majority is fundamentalist. In contrast, protecting organised minority is a 'secular' duty. This is the high point of 'secular' India." (Full Story)

This unwarranted and unjustified act of US is insult to Indian sovereignity, and very obviously so, if one can rise above the petty personal/political issues and see. Mr. Narendra Modi has not been convicted by any court of Law in India. Irrespective of how much I hate him for his complicity in Gujarat riots, he is still head of the state of the free, fair and democratically elected government of the Union of India. Even if he is guilty, United States has no right to meddle into domestic matters of India. We, the people of India, can and will punish him. And for the record again, he is not proven guilty. I am not trying to play down the massacre in Gujarat, but to tell Indians, on our face, by an outside nation who has no business nosing in internal affairs of India, specially so when its own hands are dripping from blood, and expect us to listen? No way!

Indication of his support in riots are no more than the indications of Bush's war for no reason in Iraq. And this press conference by Modi pretty much sums up what I wanted to say. Rallies and protests that were planned in US in the cities where Narendra Modi was going, that lead to "reasoning" behind the denial, are no way compared to what happened during Republican National Convention in New York. Perhaps Mr. Bush should also be denied US citizenship (and, of course, Indian visa)? Why does US keeps reminding us again and again of its hypocritical policies? And, interestingly, some people claim that by doing so, United States have upheld the "deep commitment to human rights" once again. Human rights. Hmm, remember Abu Ghraib?

Central Govt.'s request for reconsideration of visa is sure a very positive and unexpected reaction. UPA Govt.'s nonpartisan stand on this issue must be lauded. People seems to think that Gujarat riots are only riots where interests of minority were hurt (in India), under "communal" regime of BJP. After all, Sikhs, which were killed in much larger number during Congress rule in Capital after murder of then prime minister Indira Gandhi, and riots of Bombay after bomb blasts in early nineties wouldn't count, as "secular" Congress was in power. One fact that everyone chose to overlook is that one-third of those killed during Gujarat riots were Hindus, apart from the live carnage that started it off in the first place.

And need I mention the Honb'le President of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan where minorities are completely wiped out (There are many other examples of such noble religiously tolerant people which are welcomed on red-carpet by the US and, in few cases, made 'most favoured ally', read this)? But again, oh pardon me, I am communal for I am championing rights of Hindu minorities.

Update: (Mar 20) One more nice article
Update: (Mar 21) Final nail in the head!

If this article is to be believed than US has an egg on its face. It deliberately and blatantly LIED, irrespective of Modi was responsible or not for Gujarat riots. Some snippets follows:

"Just because American soldiers have murdered, raped and pillaged in My Lai, ... indulged in ghastly torture and denial of human dignity at Abu Ghreib; simply because CIA operatives have subverted democracy in Nicaragua, El Salvador and Guatemala ... only because US foreign policy has fathered monsters like Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden, the commander-in-chief of the US army, the president of the USA, cannot be held responsible."

"...casual application of a dubious American law...Section 212(a)(2)(G) of the US Immigration and Nationality Act...hides more than it reveals."

"Any alien who, while serving as a foreign government official, was responsible for or directly carried out, at any time during the preceding 24-month period, particularly severe violations of religious freedom, as defined..."

There are many more strong points in this interesting read! Must read if you think I am wrong.

Tuesday, March 15, 2005

My India Visit


January 24 - February 20, 2005
Pictures Here

I visited India last month first time after coming here. It was, surprisingly, not as surprising experience, as I had expected it to be. Looks like I am still Indian enough! Except that for first week there I had pretty hard time crossing roads. Being accustomed to cars stopping before me, when I so desire in US, I had difficulty finding gapes in the continuous trafffic stream. My risk threshold has perhaps decreased.

I also had this wonderful opportunity to visit my communty fair, a once-in-a-twelve-year rare event, where all my family members and all relatives and everybody from my community gathered in a village for full eight days and seven nights. We stayed under tents and cooked food on chulhas and slepts on sheets on farmland and bathed at local well and had great time together. The purpose of this kind of gathering is to meet all your acquaintances at one place and thats what happened all the time. You just go to tents and meet people and they offer you snacks and you eat & chat. There were various rides, more specifically Indian jhula, and vendors as typical in any fair.

Staying among village people, who would not be tired geting too excited on being weighed on a talking (taped) weighing machine was nice opportunity too see rural India from so close. I liked this so much, and I didn't even make fuss about poor quality of drinking water even after being NRI, that I enjoyed every moment of my stay. I had chance to meet my numerous relatives, and see lots of new bhabhis and neices and nephews and friends, and pretty girls! Only part I didn't like in this whole affair was where I had to fill up a jug in the morning and look for ....

Monday, March 14, 2005

The Truman Show


I usually don't review movies. I am neither interested nor competent enough (this guy does, and pretty funny too). Nevertheless I can always express my opinions. Disregarding direction or any other aspect of cinematography that is there to be considered, and judging only by script, I consider The Truman Show an extreme example of creativity in script writing, of course, among the movies I have seen so far, along with the Blast from the Past. Story is a fusion of comedy and drama, and depicts the life on an individual adopted by corporations who is on TV live 24 x 7 without any knowledge of the same.

An ultimate dimension in reality shows!

Wednesday, March 9, 2005

Public hearing for tress!


Even after more than twenty month's stay in US, things always spring up which leave you surprised. Take for instance, this notice posted on some trees along the Massachusetts Avenue in MIT. It stated that those trees were planned to be cut, and a public hearing would take place at some-place at so-and-so time. Now, thats surprising, isn't it? While, in India, we do not even know about existence trees around us, and cutting them is mostly a matter of personal choice by the nearest neighbhour, or set of wood collectors, here they are holding public hearing for it. Interesting!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Boston's fickle weather is never a news, but what happened today was something new, at least to me. It snowed in the evening today, but more importantly, winds too blew very strongly, and consequently it appeared as if it is raining snow! No amount of clothing - if it stays in place due to wind - could prevent you from hitting snow on your face. It is so crazily wonderful experience that cannot be captured in words, and unfortunately not in pictures too, unless you have water-proof camera, which I didn't.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Today I came across a couple of websites which pictured some family. Interesting part is that they had pictures of every family member taken on same day every year for over 25 years! Seems pretty interesting to me, and I plan to start my own too, so we can really see how we grow old. Oops.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Check this interesting article highligting India's Defence Research & Development Organization's achievements for what is has done for us!
http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/jan/17spec1.htm

Breaking the Bias – Lessons from Bayesian Statistical Perspective

Equitable and fair institutions are the foundation of modern democracies. Bias, as referring to “inclination or prejudice against one perso...