If a tree falls in the jungle and no one hears it, then did it really fall? If you visited a place for tourism and didn’t take photographs, did you really visit that place?
I wished to write a full blog post on this topic but I found it difficult to verbalize what I wanted to say. There is this strange nagging feeling in me which says what is a point of visiting a place when you cannot photograph it for later. Thing is, with internet and television documentaries, visiting a place for seeing something is least important since that can be done at comfort of home. It is more about outing, socializing and experience. I know that something is wrong in that but I still feel that way. I don’t know if I am weird or unique in this. And it’s not about showing to others too.
Book Review - Music of the Primes by Marcus du Sautoy (2003)
I can say, with some modesty, that I am familiar with the subject of mathematics more than an average person is. Despite that I hadn’t ever ...
-
One of the option on Orkut for describing your looks is "mirror cracking material". I always wondered if it's extreme on posi...
-
India is as diverse country as one can be. Everything changes practically every hundred kilometers, including food, clothing, rituals, langu...
-
One of the interesting things MS Word does, after checking spellings and grammar, if you've set up right option, is to display readabili...